|
Affinity Biosciences
primary antibodies against human dpp4 ![]() Primary Antibodies Against Human Dpp4, supplied by Affinity Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+dpp4/anti+cd163+human/pmc13017899-238-0-6 Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primary antibodies against human dpp4 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
antibodies against dpp4 ![]() Antibodies Against Dpp4, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+dpp4/Mouse+DPPIV%2FCD26+Antibody/pm41187974-66-8-14 Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against dpp4 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ABclonal Biotechnology
primary antibody against dpp4 a1455 ![]() Primary Antibody Against Dpp4 A1455, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+dpp4/primary+antibody+against+dpp4+a1455/pm40001226-60-6-10 Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primary antibody against dpp4 a1455 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Thermo Fisher
rabbit monoclonal antibody against dpp4 ![]() Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody Against Dpp4, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+dpp4/pm39625989-263-16-21 Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit monoclonal antibody against dpp4 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Danaher Inc
antibody against dpp4 ![]() Antibody Against Dpp4, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+dpp4/pmc11099486-59-6-10 Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibody against dpp4 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
ABclonal Biotechnology
antibodies against dpp 4 ![]() Antibodies Against Dpp 4, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+dpp4/DPP4+Rabbit+pAb/pm38296116-60-0-21 Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against dpp 4 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Cell Signaling Technology Inc
primary antibodies against dpp4 ![]() Primary Antibodies Against Dpp4, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/antibody+against+dpp4/dpp4+antibody/pm38030058-90-9-15 Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primary antibodies against dpp4 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-11
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
Article Title: Integrative pan-cancer analysis of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 with clinical and in vitro validation in prostate cancer
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1616889
Figure Lengend Snippet: The flow chart, differential expression analysis, ceRNA network construction, and PPI network construction. (A) The flow chart of our analysis. (B) Expression of DPP4 in 33 tumor types between normal tissues and tumor tissues. DPP4 expression was down-regulated in BRCA ( p < 0.001), CESC ( p < 0.05), CHOL ( p < 0.001), COAD ( p < 0.05), KICH ( p < 0.001), LUSC ( p < 0.001), PCPG ( p < 0.05), READ ( p < 0.01) and UCEC ( p < 0.01), while it was up-regulated in GBM ( p < 0.01), KIRC ( p < 0.001), KIRP ( p < 0.001), LIHC ( p < 0.001), LUAD ( p < 0.001), STAD ( p < 0.05) and THCA ( p < 0.001). (C) The ceRNA network of DPP4. There were three key miRNAs correlated with DPP4 and there were eight lncRNAs correlated with the key miRNAs. (D) The PPI network of DPP4. At the proteomic level, DPP4 was closely associated with FN1, CXCR4, CAV1, ITGB1, PTPRC, ADA, GCG, GIP, ACE2, and PRCP. ceRNA, competing endogenous RNA; lncRNA, long non-coding RNA; PPI, Protein-Protein Interaction. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Quantitative Proteomics, Expressing
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
Article Title: Integrative pan-cancer analysis of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 with clinical and in vitro validation in prostate cancer
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1616889
Figure Lengend Snippet: Survival analysis and univariate Cox regression analysis in pan-cancer. (A) Survival analysis of DPP4 in pan-cancer. K-M survival curves indicated DPP4 was positively correlated with OS in KIRC ( p < 0.001), with DSS in KIRC ( p < 0.001), and with DFS in PRAD ( p < 0.001). (B) Univariate Cox model of OS. DPP4 expression was a risk factor in DLBC (HR = 2.757, 95%CI = 1.066-7.127, p = 0.036), LAML (HR = 2.757, 95%CI = 1.066-7.127, p = 0.036), LGG (HR = 3.474, 95%CI = 2.617-4.611, p < 0.001), and LUSC (HR = 1.118, 95%CI = 1.000-2.014, p < 0.049), and it was a protective factor in KIRC (HR = 0.787, 95%CI = 0.716-0.865, p < 0.001), KIRP (HR = 0.789, 95%CI = 0.675-0.921, p = 0.003), LUAD (HR = 0.911, 95%CI = 0.837-0.992, p = 0.031), THCA (HR = 0.701, 95%CI = 0.553-0.887, p = 0.003), and THYM (HR = 0.440, 95%CI = 0.233-0.830, p = 0.011). (C) Univariate Cox model of DFS. DPP4 expression was a risk factor in LGG (HR = 4.698, 95%CI = 1.068-20.654, p = 0.041) and UCS (HR = 1.542, 95%CI = 1.004-2.370, p = 0.048), while it was a protective factor in PRAD (HR = 0.727, 95%CI = 0.567-0.931, p = 0.012). (D) Univariate Cox model in DSS. DPP4 expression was a risk factor in LGG (HR = 3.573, 95%CI = 2.672-4.778, p < 0.001), BRCA (HR = 1.383, 95%CI = 1.133-1.689, p = 0.001), DLBC (HR = 7.111, 95%CI = 1.469-34.432, p = 0.015), and ACC (HR = 1.343, 95%CI = 1.036-1.742, p = 0.026), while it was a protective factor in KIRC (HR = 0.703, 95%CI = 0.630-0.784, p < 0.001), KIRP (HR = 0.706, 95%CI = 0.595-0.838, p < 0.001), THCA (HR = 0.593, 95%CI = 0.419-0.839, p = 0.003), and LUAD (HR = 0.872, 95%CI = 0.782-0.971, p = 0.013). (E) Univariate Cox model in PFS. DPP4 expression was a risk factor in LGG (HR = 2.442, 95%CI = 1.884-3.163, p < 0.001), PCPG (HR = 1.832, 95%CI = 1.041-3.226, p = 0.036), and LUSC (HR = 1.137, 95%CI = 1.005-1.285, p = 0.041), while it was a protective factor in KIRC (HR = 0.787, 95%CI = 0.717-0.864, p < 0.001), PRAD (HR = 0.736, 95%CI = 0.638-0.850, p < 0.001), KIRP (HR = 0.818, 95%CI = 0.711-0.942, p = 0.005), PAAD (HR = 0.794, 95%CI = 0.659-0.956, p = 0.015), and MESO (HR = 0.836, 95%CI = 0.716-0.976, p = 0.023). OS, Overall Survival; DFS, Disease-Free Survival; DSS, Disease-Specific Survival; PFS, Progression-Free Survival. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 .
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Expressing
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
Article Title: Integrative pan-cancer analysis of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 with clinical and in vitro validation in prostate cancer
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1616889
Figure Lengend Snippet: Relationship of DPP4 expression with TME in pan-cancer. (A) Correlation of DPP4 expression with MSI. It was positively correlated with MSI in COAD ( p < 0.001), ESCA ( p < 0.05), and KIRC ( p < 0.01), while it was negatively related in DLBC ( p < 0.001), HNSC ( p < 0.05), LUSC ( p < 0.001), PRAD ( p < 0.01), SKCM ( p < 0.001), and UCS ( p < 0.05). (B) Correlation of DPP4 expression with TMB. It was positively correlated with TMB in LAML ( p < 0.01), SARC ( p < 0.05), ESCA ( p < 0.001), KIRP ( p < 0.001), COAD ( p < 0.01), UCEC ( p < 0.05), GBM ( p < 0.05), LIHC ( p < 0.05), and OV ( p < 0.05), while it was negatively correlated in THYM ( p < 0.001), LUSC ( p < 0.001), CESC ( p < 0.05), PRAD ( p < 0.001), BRCA ( p < 0.001), and LUAD ( p < 0.05). (C) The relationship between DPP4 expression and immune-related genes. There is a significant association between DPP4 expression and immune-related genes across various cancers, particularly with NRP1 and HHLA2. Additionally, the majority of immune genes showed a positive correlation with DPP4 expression in BLCA, BRCA, LGG, SKCM, and THCA. (D) In PRAD, DPP4 expression was positively correlated with T cells CD4 memory resting (R = 0.18, p < 0.001), while it was negatively correlated with T cells CD8 (R = -0.19, p < 0.001), and T cells regulatory (R = -0.19, p < 0.001). MSI, Microsatellite Instability; TMB, Tumor Mutation Burden; TME, Tumor Microenvironment. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 .
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Expressing, Mutagenesis
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
Article Title: Integrative pan-cancer analysis of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 with clinical and in vitro validation in prostate cancer
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1616889
Figure Lengend Snippet: Drug sensitivity prediction for DPP4 in (A) CellMiner, (B) CTRP and (C) GDSC databases. The expression of DPP4 was negatively related with drug sensitivity of most drugs. However, several drugs were positively related with DPP4 expression, including perifosine and adavosertib from CellMiner, dasatinib and saracatinib from CTRP, and cetuximab and crizotinib from GDSC. (D) The molecular docking analysis of DPP4 and dasatinib. (E) The molecular docking analysis of DPP4 and midostaurin. (F) The molecular docking analysis of DPP4 and saracatinib. (G) The molecular docking analysis of DPP4 and selumetinib. The possible binding sites were illustrated. (H) RMSD values of the protein-ligand complexes over time. The DPP4-Saracatinib complex reached equilibrium after 20 ns, with its RMSD fluctuating around 2.2 Å. The DPP4-Selumetinib complex reached equilibrium after 20 ns, fluctuating around 4.1 Å. The DPP4-Dasatinib complex reached equilibrium after 20 ns, fluctuating around 2.0 Å. The DPP4-Midostaurin complex reached equilibrium after 30 ns, fluctuating around 2.2 Å. (I) Rg of the protein-ligand complexes over time. All complex systems exhibited only minor fluctuations throughout the simulation. (J) SASA of the protein-ligand complexes over time. The results indicate that the SASA of the complexes did not change significantly after ligand binding to DPP4. (K) RMSF of the protein-ligand complexes. The RMSF values for all complexes were relatively low, with most residues fluctuating below 3 Å. RMSD, Root Mean Square Deviation; RMSF, Root-Mean-Square Fluctuation; Rg, Radius of gyration; SASA, Solvent-Accessible Surface Area.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Expressing, Binding Assay, Ligand Binding Assay, Solvent
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
Article Title: Integrative pan-cancer analysis of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 with clinical and in vitro validation in prostate cancer
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1616889
Figure Lengend Snippet: A single-cell transcriptomic atlas of DPP4 in prostate cancer. (A) UMAP dimension reduction plot exhibiting 386,664 single-cell transcriptomes across nine major cell lineages (B cell, DC, endothelial cell, epithelial cell, fibroblast, mast cell, mono_macro, NK cell, and T cell) and 18 minor subtypes (luminal, basal, NE, NK cell, CD4+ T cell, CD8+ T cell, B cell, plasma cell, monocyte, macrophage, cDC1, cDC2, pDC, mast cell, fibroblast, SMC, pericyte, and endothelial cell). (B) Bubble plots depicting the feature expression of different marker genes in nine major cell subtypes. (C) UMAP dimension reduction plots by Grade1-5. (D) Bar plot demonstrating that the proportion of epithelial cells varied greatly in different grades of prostate cancer. (E) Stacked bar plots highlighting the enrichment of upregulated DEGs in epithelial cells within non-metastatic prostate cancer. (F, G) DPP4 expression was exclusively expressed in luminal cells. (H) Violin plots comparing DPP4 expression levels across ISUP grades, showing significantly higher expression in low-grade groups (p < 0.001). (I) Violin plots showing DPP4 expression across clinical T stages, indicating a significant downregulation in advanced stages (p < 0.001). (J) The interaction network illustrating the cellular communications of DPP4+ epithelial cells. (K) Heatmap summarizing the total interaction numbers, highlighting that DPP4+ epithelial cells exhibit significant communication with fibroblasts. (L) Volcano plot showing genes significantly perturbed by virtual DPP4 knockout in epithelial cells. (M) Functional enrichment analysis of the significantly perturbed genes following virtual KO of DPP4. UMAP, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; DEG, Differential Expressed Genes; KO, Knockout.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Single Cell, Clinical Proteomics, Expressing, Marker, Knock-Out, Functional Assay
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
Article Title: Integrative pan-cancer analysis of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 with clinical and in vitro validation in prostate cancer
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1616889
Figure Lengend Snippet: Higher DPP4 expression was correlated with better prognosis in prostate cancer. (A) The inclusion and exclusion criteria of the cohort. (B) IHC scores revealed that normal tissue exhibited significantly higher DPP4 expression compared to tumor tissues ( p < 0.001). (C) Representative IHC images of both prostate cancer and normal tissues from the cohort demonstrated this difference visually. (D) The Chi square test showed that DPP4 expression was associated with WHO/ISUP grade ( p = 0.03). (E) The K-M survival curve indicated that higher DPP4 expression was not significantly correlated with OS and PFS ( p > 0.05). However, DPP4 expression tended to be a protective factor. (F) Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that high DPP4 expression was an independent protective factor for OS in prostate cancer patients (HR = 0.052, 95%CI = 0.0041 - 0.65, p = 0.02). IHC, Immunohistochemical; OS, Overall Survival; PFS, Progression-Free Survival.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Expressing, Immunohistochemical staining
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
Article Title: Integrative pan-cancer analysis of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 with clinical and in vitro validation in prostate cancer
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1616889
Figure Lengend Snippet: Dasatinib and midostaurin regulated DPP4 expression. (A) IC50 of 22Rv1 and C4–2 treated with dasatinib tested by CCK-8 assays. (B) IC50 of 22Rv1 and C4–2 treated with midostarin tested by CCK-8 assays. (C) Dasatinib treatment significantly increased DPP4 expression in C4–2 cells ( p = 0.0042, primer 1; p = 0.0029, primer 2). In contrast, midostaurin treatment reduced DPP4 expression in both cell lines (C4-2: p = 0.0218, primer 1; 22Rv1: p = 0.0172, primer 1; p = 0.0002, primer 2). IC50, Half maximal inhibitory concentration; CCK-8, Cell Counting Kit-8.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Expressing, CCK-8 Assay, Concentration Assay, Cell Counting
Journal: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
Article Title: Increased Thyroid DPP4 Expression Is Associated With Inflammatory Process in Patients With Hashimoto Thyroiditis
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad723
Figure Lengend Snippet: Baseline characteristics of the control and Hashimoto thyroiditis groups
Article Snippet: Thyroid sections were incubated with primary
Techniques: Concentration Assay, Activity Assay
Journal: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
Article Title: Increased Thyroid DPP4 Expression Is Associated With Inflammatory Process in Patients With Hashimoto Thyroiditis
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad723
Figure Lengend Snippet: The serum concentration and activity of DPP4 in the control and HT groups. A, Serum DPP4 concentration. B, Serum DPP4 activity. Data are shown as mean ± SD. DPP4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; HT, Hashimoto thyroiditis.
Article Snippet: Thyroid sections were incubated with primary
Techniques: Concentration Assay, Activity Assay
Journal: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
Article Title: Increased Thyroid DPP4 Expression Is Associated With Inflammatory Process in Patients With Hashimoto Thyroiditis
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad723
Figure Lengend Snippet: Thyroid DPP4 expression and its association with inflammatory factors. A, mRNA expression of DPP4 and inflammatory factors in the thyroid of the control and HT groups. B, The protein expression of thyroid DPP4 in the thyroid of the control and HT groups. GAPDH was used as a loading control. C, The DPP4 activity in the thyroid of the control and HT groups. D, Correlation analysis of the DPP4 mRNA expression and the mRNA expression of inflammatory factors in thyroid tissue. E, Correlation analysis between the mRNA expression and activity of DPP4 in thyroid tissue and the serum concentration and activity of DPP4. F, Correlation analysis between the mRNA expression of DPP4 and serum TPOAb/TgAb levels. G, Enhanced DPP4 expression on lymphocytes in thyroid tissue of HT patients. Representative images of HE and IHC staining of DPP4 in the thyroid sections from control and HT patients (200× magnification, light microscope). Scale bar = 100μm. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. * P less than .05, ** P less than .01, *** P less than .001. DPP4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; HE, hematoxylin and eosin staining; HT, Hashimoto thyroiditis; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; IHC, immunohistochemistry; IL-1β, interleukin 1β; INF-γ, interferon γ; mRNA, messenger RNA; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α.
Article Snippet: Thyroid sections were incubated with primary
Techniques: Expressing, Activity Assay, Concentration Assay, Immunohistochemistry, Light Microscopy, Staining
Journal: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
Article Title: Increased Thyroid DPP4 Expression Is Associated With Inflammatory Process in Patients With Hashimoto Thyroiditis
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad723
Figure Lengend Snippet: Overview of single-cell transcriptomic analysis. A, UMAP plot of the 11 identified cell types. B, Dot plots showing the 28 marker gene expressions among the 11 cell types. The size of dots represents the proportion of cells expressing the particular marker gene, and the color spectrum indicates the mean expression levels of the marker gene (log transformed). C, Relative proportion of each cell type. D, The DPP4 expression in the CT and HT group. E, UMAP plot highlighting the gene expression of IL7R (T cell) and DPP4. F, DPP4 expression in different T-cell cluster between HT and control groups. G, The cell-cell communications heat map based on the relative expression of ligand-receptor pairs. CT, control group; DPP4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; HT, Hashimoto thyroiditis; UMAP, uniform maximal approximation projection.
Article Snippet: Thyroid sections were incubated with primary
Techniques: Marker, Expressing, Transformation Assay